![]() |
|
|
NOTE
: It is often INCORRECTLY
taught in High School that it is the lowest sum of locants that
determines the numbering scheme.
|
Here are some illustrative examples of the first point of difference rule:
| 2-methylpentane not 4-methylpentane. |
![]() |
Here the methyl group is given the lowest number by numbering
as shown. |
| 2,2,4-trimethylpentane not 2,4,4-trimethylpentane |
![]() |
The first difference is in the second locant - by numbering as
shown this is kept lower (2- rather than 4-). |
| 2,4,4-trimethylhexane not 3,3,5-trimethylhexane |
![]() |
The first difference is in the first locant - by numbering as shown this is kept lower (2 rather than 3). |
| 1-ethyl-2-methylcyclohexane not 2-ethyl-1-methylcyclohexane or 1-ethyl-6-methylcyclohexane |
![]() |
The numbering is determined by the alphabetisation : ethyl preceeds methyl so ethyl gets the lower
number. But then we number counter-clockwise to give the methyl the
lower number (2- vs 6-) |
| pentan-2-ol not pentan-4-ol |
![]() |
Here
the principle functional group, the alcohol -OH is give the lowest
locant by numbering as shown. |
| pentan-3-ol no choice ! |
![]() |
No
matter which way this is numbered, the -OH is at C3. |
| 4-methylpentan-2-ol not 2-methylpentan-4-ol |
![]() |
The first difference is in the -OH locant - by numbering as shown this is kept lower (2- rather than 4-). |
| 2-methylpentan-3-ol not 4-methylpentan-3-ol |
![]() |
The first difference is in the methyl locant - since the -OH must be at C3 either way, but by numbering as shown the methyl locant kept lower (2- rather than 4-). |
| © Dr. Ian Hunt, Department of Chemistry, University of Calgary |